Suggestions, connect with, and you can candidate sex within the You

Suggestions, connect with, and you can candidate sex within the You

101 . Newhagen , John Age. , “Past care about-report: Using latency to resolve model issue reacting processes toward web-founded public opinion studies,” from the Sourcebook getting Governmental Communications Browse , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and Lance Holbert , R. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Bing College student

102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and Hibbing , John R. , “Governmental thinking differ with psychological attributes,” Science , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Student

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is actually female very likely to choose to have ladies’ facts debts than its men colleagues?” Legislative Education Quarterly 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Female Generate: The insurance policy Impression of women within the Congress ( il : University regarding Chi town Push , 2002 ).Bing Beginner

105 . Hill , Kim Quaile and you can Hurley , Patricia An excellent. , “Emblematic speeches in the You.S. Senate in addition to their representational ramifications,” Diary out-of Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Should blacks show blacks and you may feminine portray women? A beneficial contingent ‘yes’,” Journal of Government 1999 , 61 ( step three ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle College student

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-related governmental training and also the detailed expression of women,” Governmental Behavior 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Is there a good ‘gender affinity effect’ from inside the Western politics? S. Domestic elections,” Governmental Research Every quarter 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

This post could have been quoted from the pursuing the books. That it number is done centered on analysis provided by Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney An excellent. and you may Lust, Ellen 2015. Could it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A task Congruity Idea away from Applicant Electability during the Transformation Tunisia. Perspectives for the Politics, Vol. 13, Point. step one, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Yards. 2015. Which stereotypes female candidates? Pinpointing personal variations in feminine stereotype reliance. Government, Organizations, and you can Identities, Vol. 3, Question. step one, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “This new role out of gender from inside the descriptive symbol,” Governmental Research Every quarter 1995 , 48 : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, More youthful Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. When feminine assault. Government therefore the Lives Sciences, Vol. 34, Point. 1, p. 49.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving mixed indicators: the brand new character out-of gender and you can partisanship when you look at the product reviews off how to meet younger woman politicians. Record of Elections, Public-opinion and you will Activities, Vol. twenty six, Point. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you may Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. That have Heart and you will (No) Mind? How Users Adversely Infer Shed Factual statements about Politicians and exactly how So it Affects the Testing of your own Speakermunication Lookup, Vol. 43, Thing. eight, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Determining Perceptions regarding Female Political figures: Possible out-of Poland. Politics inside the Main European countries, Vol. 14, Procedure. 3, p. eight.

Schneider, Monica C. and you may Bos, Angela L. 2019. The use of Societal Role Principle to the Examination of Gender inside the Government. Governmental Mindset, Vol. forty, Situation. S1, p. 173.

Park, Sunshine Young and Baek, Younger Minute 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence to the Feminine Political leaders: As to why Ambivalence Issues to own Gender Equivalence during the good Democracy. Record of women, Government & Coverage, Vol. 40, Matter. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Profile Assassination and you will Women in Government. Corvinus Diary from Global Points, Vol. 4, Point. step 1, p. 15.

Aaldering, Loes and you may Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Leaders on the Mass media: Gender Prejudice within the Frontrunner Stereotypes while in the Strategy and Routine Times. Uk Diary regarding Governmental Technology, Vol. 50, Matter. 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. Just how do People Determine Road?Top Bureaucrats’ Love and you can Skills? Good Typology and you may Sample. Social Administration Review, Vol. 80, Thing. 4, p. 532.